Kompetensi Dokter Umum di Unit Gawat Darurat dalam Manajemen Jalan Napas: Tinjauan Sistematis dan Meta-Analisis (2015–2025)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62354/jurnalmedicare.v4i2.193Kata Kunci:
emergency departement, airway management, competencyAbstrak
Emergency airway management is frequently performed by general practitioners in emergency departments (EDs); however, their success rates remain poorly defined. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar (2015–2025) for studies reporting endotracheal intubation (ETI) or supraglottic airway (SGA) placement by general practitioners or non-specialist residents in the ED. Exclusion criteria were specialist operators and surgical airway procedures. Fifteen studies (31 874 ETI attempts) were analysed qualitatively; five sufficiently homogeneous studies were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis using first-pass success (FPS) as the effect measure. The pooled FPS for general practitioners was 75 % (95 % CI, 70–80 %; I² = 92 %). Major complications (hypoxaemia, hypotension, aspiration) ranged from 12 % to 49 % and increased significantly with each additional intubation attempt. Simulation studies showed 97 % successful ventilation with SGA placement by novice operators compared with 62 % with ETI. Determinants of success included ≥ 50 prior ETI experiences, use of rapid sequence intubation, video laryngoscopy, senior supervision, adherence to difficult-airway algorithms, and regular simulation training. ETI competency among general practitioners in EDs remains below the international benchmark of ≥ 85 % FPS. Enhanced formal training, wider availability of video laryngoscopes and SGAs, structured supervision protocols, and recurring simulation programmes are recommended to close this skills gap and improve patient safety.
Unduhan
Referensi
1.Brown CA 3rd, Bair AE, Pallin DJ, Walls RM, NEAR III Investigators. Techniques, success, and adverse events of emergency department adult intubations. Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;65(4):363–70.e1.
2. Goto T, Oka S, Okamoto H, Hagiwara Y, Watase H, Hasegawa K. Association of Number of Physician Postgraduate Years With Patient Intubation Outcomes in the Emergency Department. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 8;5(4):e226622–e226622.
3. Dai Y, Walline JH, Yu H, Zhu H, Xu J, Yu X. Tracheal Intubation in Emergency Departments in China: A National Cross-Sectional Survey. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 25;9:813833.
4. Tamilarasu KP, Aazmi A, Vinayagam S, Rajendran G, Patel S, Aazmi B. A Prospective Observational Study of Endotracheal Intubation Practices in an Academic Emergency Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India. Cureus. 2023 Mar;15(3):e36072.
5. Yildirim MK, Göksu E, El Warea M. Evaluation of endotracheal intubations in the emergency department of a tertiary care facility. Turk J Emerg Med. 2023 Mar 27;23(2):82–7.
6. Marciano R, Mullis DM, Jauch EC, Saef SH. 121: Are emergency physicians comfortable treating admitted psychiatric patients who are boarding in the emergency department when inpatient beds are not available? Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;56(3):S41.
7. Lockey D, Crewdson K, Weaver A, Davies G. Observational study of the success rates of intubation and failed intubation airway rescue techniques in 7256 attempted intubations of trauma patients by pre-hospital physicians. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Aug;113(2):220–5.
8. Shavit I, Levit B, Basat NB, Lait D, Somri M, Gaitini L. Establishing a definitive airway in the trauma patient by novice intubators: A randomised crossover simulation study. Injury. 2015 Nov;46(11):2108–12.
9. Lee GT, Park JE, Woo SY, Shin TG, Jeong D, Kim T, et al. Defining the learning curve for endotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 1;12(1):14903.
10. Fathil SM, Mohd. Mahdi SN, Che’Man Z, Hassan A, Ahmad Z, Ismail AK. A prospective study of tracheal intubation in an academic emergency department in Malaysia. International Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2010 Sep 21;3(4):233–7.
11. Price J, Lachowycz K, Steel A, Moncur L, Major R, Barnard EBG. Intubation success in prehospital emergency anaesthesia: a retrospective observational analysis of the Inter-Changeable Operator Model (ICOM). Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Jul 8;30(1):44.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Jurnal Medicare

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Licensing for Data Publication
-
Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
-
Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
-
Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/