TINJAUAN PUSTAKA AKSES YANG TIDAK SETARA TERHADAP PEMERIKSAAN KANKER SERVIKS: PERSPEKTIF GENDER DAN KESEHATAN PUBLIK DI ERA DIGITAL

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62354/jurnalmedicare.v4i3.217

Keywords:

cervical cancer, health equity, gender disparieties, digital health, screening access

Abstract

Cervical cancer is a global health problem, with 85-90% of cases and deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries due to limited screening availability. This study used a qualitative review of 20 scientific papers (2021-2025) to investigate disparities in screening availability and digital advances such as AI, telehealth. Findings suggest that digital tools improve diagnostic accuracy and user consent, such as AI-driven sensitivity and self-sampling willens access for rural women and individuals with disabilities. However, barriers such as inadequate facilities, hidden costs, social bias, scarcity of medical staff, and systemic discrimination continue to limit engagement. Use of technology without support from digital literacy, culturally aware conversations, and gender-friendly rules may further exacerbate the divide. In short, screening programs must be open, inclusive, and combine digital advances with national referral networks and equity – to ensure cervical cancer screening is available and equitable for all.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agénor, M., Noh, M., Eiduson, R., LeBlanc, M., Line, E. C., Goldman, R. E., Potter, J., & Austin, S. B. (2024). Barriers to and opportunities for advancing racial equity in cervical cancer screening in the United States. BMC Women’s Health, 24(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03151-7

Asare, M., Owusu-Sekyere, E., Elizondo, A., & Benavidez, G. A. (2024). Exploring Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake among Women in the United States: Impact of Social Determinants of Health and Psychosocial Determinants. Behavioral Sciences, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090811

Buelens, C., Stabel, M., Wildiers, A., Peremans, L., Van Hal, G., Van Doorsselaere, L., Lievens, A., Vorsters, A., Van Keer, S., & Verhoeven, V. (2024). Experiences and Perceptions of Cervical Cancer Screening Using Self-Sampling among Under-Screened Women in Flanders. Healthcare, 12(17), 1704. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12171704

Chirwa, G. C. (2022). Explaining socioeconomic inequality in cervical cancer screening uptake in Malawi. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13750-4

Datchoua Moukam, A. M., Embolo Owono, M. S., Kenfack, B., Vassilakos, P., Petignat, P., Sormani, J., & Schmidt, N. C. (2021). “Cervical cancer screening: awareness is not enough”. Understanding barriers to screening among women in West Cameroon a qualitative study using focus groups. Reproductive Health, 18(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01186-9

Emerson, A., Dogan, M., Hawes, E., Wilson, K., Chana, S. M., Kelly, P. J., Comfort, M., & Ramaswamy, M. (2024). Cervical cancer screening barriers and facilitators from the perspectives of women with a history of criminal-legal system involvement and substance use. Health and Justice, 12(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-024-00262-z

Gomes, M., Provaggi, E., Pembe, A. B., Olaitan, A., & Gentry-Maharaj, A. (2025). Advancing Cervical Cancer Prevention Equity: Innovations in Self-Sampling and Digital Health Technologies Across Healthcare Settings. Diagnostics, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15091176

Kabukye, J. K., Namugga, J., Mpamani, C. J., Katumba, A., Nakatumba-Nabende, J., Nabuuma, H., Musoke, S. S., Nankya, E., Soomre, E., Nakisige, C., & Orem, J. (2023). Implementing Smartphone-Based Telemedicine for Cervical Cancer Screening in Uganda: Qualitative Study of Stakeholders’ Perceptions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2196/45132

Le Goff, J., Le Duc-Banaszuk, A. S., Lefeuvre, C., Pivert, A., Ducancelle, A., De Pauw, H., Arbyn, M., Vinay, A., & Rexand-Galais, F. (2024). Acceptance of Self-Sampling by Women Not Regularly Participating in Cervical Cancer Screening in Areas with Low Medical Density: A Qualitative Study within the French CapU4 Trial. Cancers, 16(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16112066

Li, X., Chen, S., Hirose, N., & Shimpuku, Y. (2024). Association between multiple dimensions of access to care and cervical cancer screening among Kenyan women: a cross-sectional analysis of the Demographic Health Survey. BMC Health Services Research, 24(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11169-8

Lin, E., Sleboda, P., Rimel, B. J., Chen, J. T., Hernandez, D. V., & Datta, G. D. (2024). Sexual orientation and gender identity inequities in cervical cancer screening by race and ethnicity. Cancer Causes and Control, 35(1), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552- 023-01771-2

Mantula, F., Toefy, Y., & Sewram, V. (2024). Barriers to cervical cancer screening in Africa: a systematic review. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024- 17842-1

McDaniel, C. C., Hallam, H. H., Cadwallader, T., Lee, H. Y., & Chou, C. (2021). Disparities in cervical cancer screening with HPV test among females with diabetes in the deep south. Cancers, 13(24), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13246319

Panta, L., Prasai, S., Vaidya, K. M., Shrestha, S., & Manandhar, S. (2025). AI Assisted Cervical Cancer Screening for Cytology Samples in Developing Countries. 1–14. http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20435

Poudel, K., Poudel, L., Shakya, P. R., Poudel, A., Shrestha, A., & Khanal, B. (2024). AI-Assisted Cervical Cancer Screening. 1–11. http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.11936

Remmel, M. L., Suija, K., Raudne, R., Tisler, A., Ķīvīte-Urtāne, A., Stankūnas, M., Nygård, M., Aasbø, G., Maļina, L., & Uusküla, A. (2024). Women’s perspectives on the acceptability of risk-based cervical cancer screening. BMC Cancer, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13050-7

Sachdeva, M., Datchoua, A. M., Yakam, V. F., Kenfack, B., Jonnalagedda-Cattin, M., Thiran, J. P., Petignat, P., & Schmidt, N. C. (2024). Acceptability of artificial intelligence for cervical cancer screening in Dschang, Cameroon: a qualitative study on patient perspectives. Reproductive Health , 21(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-024-01828-8

Spencer, J. C., Charlton, B. M., Pretsch, P. K., Schnarrs, P. W., Spees, L. P., Hudgens, M. G.,

Barclay, L., Wheeler, S. B., Brewer, N. T., & Smith, J. S. (2024). Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening by Sexual Orientation Among Low-Income Women in North Carolina. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 53(5), 1645–1652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-024- 02844-2

Vega Crespo, B., Neira, V. A., Ortíz Segarra, J., Andrade, A., Guerra, G., Ortiz, S., Flores, A., Mora, L., Verhoeven, V., Gama, A., Dias, S., Verberckmoes, B., Vermandere, H., Michelsen, K., & Degomme, O. (2022). Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening among under-screened women in Cuenca, Ecuador: the perspectives of women and health professionals. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889- 022-14601-y

Vinson, A. H., Norrid, C., Haro, E. K., Ernst, S., El Khoury, C., Alves, M. L., Kieber-Emmons, A., Kamath Mulki, A., Butcher, E. A., Kalpakjian, C., McKee, M. M., & Harper, D. M. (2025). Cervical Cancer Screening in Women With Physical Disabilities. JAMA Network Open, 8(1), e2457290. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57290

Downloads

Published

2025-07-30

How to Cite

Indira, S. M., & Ernawati, E. (2025). TINJAUAN PUSTAKA AKSES YANG TIDAK SETARA TERHADAP PEMERIKSAAN KANKER SERVIKS: PERSPEKTIF GENDER DAN KESEHATAN PUBLIK DI ERA DIGITAL. Jurnal Medicare, 4(3), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.62354/jurnalmedicare.v4i3.217

Issue

Section

Articles